Flubber (1997)

Flubber: Directed by Les Mayfield. With Robin Williams, Marcia Gay Harden, Christopher McDonald, Ted Levine. An absent-minded professor discovers “flubber,” a rubber-like super-bouncy substance.

“This movie really feels like a wasted opportunity. With so many talent involved, how could this movie turn out to be so disappointing? It probably is due to the messy script that uses too many plot lines that never get fully developed or that work out completely the way as they were suppose to. You can say that the movie feels incomplete. I donu0026#39;t know, were they in a hurry or something to complete this movie? I have a feeling that a month or two more work on the movie- and perhaps its script, would had made this movie a better one.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eItu0026#39;s still somewhat decent entertainment for the kids. The characters should be enjoyable for them and some of the comical situations are good enough to make them laugh.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eRobin Williams is always fun to watch in a comedy but however in this case it feels like heu0026#39;s holding back to not completely play a nutty professor. Itu0026#39;s perhaps a bit of a disappointing to most. When you know Robin Williams plays the lead role in a comedy you would expect some more fireworks and hilarious situations from him. His talent is wasted, a real missed opportunity for the movie to become a great one. Christopher McDonald plays a typical u0026#39;villainoushu0026#39; Christopher McDonald role and he does it once more really great. Other well known actors in the movie are Marcia Gay Harden, Raymond J. Barry (boy, heu0026#39;s beginning to look really old now), Ted Levine and Clancy Brown. But none of the characters feel really developed well enough in the movie, with the exception of the robotic character Weebo. Of course itu0026#39;s not a very good sign when the best developed- and featured character of the movie is not even an human…u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eAlso the use of u0026#39;Flubberu0026#39; is highly below par. From a movie named u0026quot;Flubberu0026quot; I expected something more from the green slimy stuff. It however doesnu0026#39;t play a that significant role in the movie and the things that are done with the Flubber are far from original or interesting. The Flubber itself however looks fantastic through some early computer effects. Remember that this movie was released in 1997 when the special effects were of course not as advanced as present day is the case. The effects from this movie look great and really fully convincing. Too bad that it isnu0026#39;t featured very well in the movie.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eThe story is of course predictable from A to Z and the movie has absolutely no surprises in it. It makes u0026quot;Flubberu0026quot; a very easily forgettable movie that is far from great. The movie had far more potential really. If only that had made some better choices with its story and perhaps picked a different director…u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eThe movie is good and professional looking, so from a technical point of view the movie does really not disappoint. Also the fun musical score by Danny Elfman makes the movie a watchable oneu003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eThe kids will probably still enjoy it but still the movie feels like a big waste of some far more and greater potential, which the movie really had.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003e5/10u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003ehttp://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/”