Ein Mann kämpft für Gerechtigkeit (1981)

17K
Share
Copy the link

Ein Mann kämpft für Gerechtigkeit: Directed by Warren Beatty. With Warren Beatty, Diane Keaton, Edward Herrmann, Jerzy Kosinski. A radical American journalist becomes involved with the Communist revolution in Russia, and hopes to bring its spirit and idealism to the United States.

“u0026#39;Redsu0026#39; is one of the finest American films ever made- it is the film that Beatty worked towards from u0026#39;Bonnie u0026amp; Clydeu0026#39;; tellingly he would not make another film until the excerable u0026#39;Ishtaru0026#39; (which was probably more fun to make than watch).u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eThis film feels like a cross between David Lean (u0026#39;Dr Zhivagou0026#39; u0026amp; u0026#39;Lawrence of Arabiau0026#39; from his oeuvre) and Oliver Stone (in u0026#39;Nixonu0026#39; mode). As with u0026#39;Bonnie u0026amp; Clydeu0026#39; the right music has been picked for the soundtrack- u0026#39;The Internationaleu0026#39; u0026amp; Keatonu0026#39;s take of u0026#39;…In my Yardu0026#39; standout (though the score is taken from Sondheim, with contributions by u0026#39;Graduateu0026#39;-composer Dave Gruisin). The film is brilliantly shot by the great Vittorio Storaro- who uses the same huge talent as he did on Bertolucciu0026#39;s u0026#39;Il Conformistau0026#39; u0026amp; Coppolau0026#39;s u0026#39;Apocalypse Now Reduxu0026#39;. Trevor Griffiths co-wrote this film- though there were contributions from a variety of historians- most notably Robert Rosenstone.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eFans of the film should consult Rosenstoneu0026#39;s biography of John Reed (u0026#39;Romantic Revolutionaryu0026#39;) and his chapter on his involvement with and objections to elements in u0026#39;Redsu0026#39; in the book u0026#39;Visions of the Pastu0026#39;. This Biopic is an interpretation of a life- as with films like u0026#39;Pattonu0026#39; it takes a rather small period of the protaganists total life experience- running from roughly 1914 to Reedu0026#39;s death from typhus in 1920. The film charts Reedu0026#39;s major experiences- his coverage of the First World War and the Mexican War of 1916 is shown- though the major achievments are his ventures into the complexities of American Socialism and American-Communism and his eventual experience in Russia/Soviet Union. The main aspect, the stalwart element throughout the film is his love affair with Louise Bryant- which is where the film begins and ends. Rosenstone believes this may have been a concession to Hollywood audience- but I think it puts the human and greater-backdrop into context.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eu0026#39;Visions of the Pastu0026#39; censures much of Beattyu0026#39;s u0026quot;twists of truthu0026quot; and the filmic conventions of compression and dramatic-symbolistic interpretation. This is not a documentary and this is not the actual John Reed. This is a biopic film, starring Warren Beatty playing u0026#39;John Reedu0026#39;. If you want to read about the real thing- try u0026#39;Romantic Revolutionaryu0026#39; and Reedu0026#39;s masterpiece u0026#39;Ten Days That Shook the Worldu0026#39; (which, ironically, came in for criticism regarding Reedu0026#39;s fictionalisation of the events of the Russian Revolution!- see the introduction to the Penguin edition by AJP Taylor). Remember historians have a vested interest in their interpretation- which by placing into lineal order in a history (non-fiction) book they are placing into a narrative form.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eBeatty and Keaton are great in this film- with brilliant support from Gene Hackman,Jack Nicholson, Paul Sorvino u0026amp; Maureen Stapleton. We see the John Reed on-screen move from Jack Reed journalist to John Reed idealist- the only American to be buried within the walls of the Kremlin.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eVarious anti-commies have objected to this film as it depicts Communism- well, at the time, this development from Marx/Engels 1848 Manifesto seemed liberating. Many intellectuals pondered on a new collective, non-Capitalist world- which was sadly a utopia that was unattainable. The Russian experiment failed- Beatty alludes to the flaws and Stalinism in the speech which the Party retranslate towards their own ends towards the end of the film. The Russian Revolution was an ideal- the workers of the world uniting- which considering the treatement meted out by the likes of Henry Ford was a good thing. This message is still relevant- as u0026#39;free market Capitalismu0026#39; means market dominance for Superpowers, poverty for others- the persistence of a constant underclass and the eradication of Union Rights. There are as many flawed ethics to Capitalism as Communism- the arms trade (Reagan/Bush to Hussain, the US-sponsored coup in Chile-Cambodia-El Salvador- a policy which continues up to the failed one last week in Venezuala). Beatty takes the socialist ideals which u0026#39;Shampoou0026#39; alluded to and which he continued in the satirical u0026#39;Bulworthu0026#39;.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eUnlike Attenboroughu0026#39;s u0026#39;Gandhiu0026#39;, this is not a biopic that is too reverent to its focus- many times Reed is shown to be a clown and it is Bryantu0026#39;s character who undergoes the vaster change- giving this film a strong feminist element. The other stroke of genius is the use of the witnesses- who provide a commentary on the film that sometimes contradict each other- alluding to a multiplicity of truths that overlap (as with Stoneu0026#39;s alternate scenarios in u0026#39;JFKu0026#39; u0026amp; u0026#39;Nixonu0026#39;- they themselves are not true but point out that the truth is relative and the accepted historist take may not be any more u0026quot;realu0026quot;).u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eThe Oscar people exhibited their usual poor taste again- choosing the yawnworthy u0026#39;Chariots of Fireu0026#39; over this for best picture (well, the year before they chose u0026#39;Ordinary Peopleu0026#39; over u0026#39;Raging Bullu0026#39;- and to this day mediocrity wins that coveted award: u0026#39;Forrest Gumpu0026#39;, u0026#39;Schindleru0026#39;s Listu0026#39;, u0026#39;Gladiatoru0026#39;, u0026#39;Braveheartu0026#39;, u0026#39;Titanicu0026#39;). This film has an epic scope- that the worthy Oscar winner u0026#39;The English Patientu0026#39; also exhibited- though both show influence from David Lean. This was a time when Hollywood had ambition and made some great films that may not have set the box-office on fire a la u0026#39;Jawsu0026#39; or u0026#39;Star Warsu0026#39; but made some great works for posterity: u0026#39;The Deer Hunteru0026#39;, u0026#39;New York New Yorku0026#39;, u0026#39;Raging Bullu0026#39;, u0026#39;Heavens Gateu0026#39; and this. u0026#39;Redsu0026#39; is a masterpiece that should be seen by everyone and desrves to take its place alongside classic works by directors such as John Ford, Howard Hawks and Orson Welles.”

Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *