Out for a Kill (Video 2003)

Out for a Kill: Directed by Michael Oblowitz. With Michelle Goh, Steven Seagal, Corey Johnson, Tom Wu. An unsuspecting university professor is an unwitting accomplice in a foiled Chinese cocaine deal. Wrongly imprisoned, he escapes to take his revenge and prove his innocence.

“Seagal is back, more monotonous than ever and with even less personality than usual. Unfortunately, thatu0026#39;s only the beginning of all the problems with this so called u0026#39;movieu0026#39;. Now, Iu0026#39;m a big fan of cheap, mindless action, but even I have limits. u0026#39;Out for a Killu0026#39; is beyond all hope.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eSeagal plays Robert Burns, a Professor of Chinese History, and Killing People. Naturally, he has a secret past that he keeps hidden when he is framed by a Triad family. He is obviously innocent, but for the sake of keeping the movie going, and thereby torturing the mind of anyone watching , the lead cop decides he must be guilty, and he is thrown into a Chinese prison. Naturally, the DEA decides that if they release Burns, heu0026#39;ll do their job for them and take out the Triads, and so Burns is free to on a global stroll of death.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eSometimes laughably bad, but generally very cringe-worthy, u0026#39;Out for a Killu0026#39; is easily one of the worst movies Iu0026#39;ve seen. Right from the start when we are treated to poorly done CGI bullet-time, followed by a massive break from action clichés when bullets actually penetrate a car and kill a good guy. Some clichés we can do without, but action movies need the bullet-proof cars. Bullet-proof cars are an essential part of action movies, and one element you just donu0026#39;t mess with.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eI still havenu0026#39;t scratched the surface, because after Oblowitz (the director) spits in the face of action-movie values, we get treated to a plot, a very poor plot. Now, I donu0026#39;t think anyone anywhere has ever watched a Seagal movie expecting a good story, but when there is not enough action to distract us, we will start paying attention to such things. In this case, Seagal swears he will get vengeance, but to do so, he must follow a series of clues which are – get this – conveniently tattooed on the arms of every bad guy Seagal kills. Bravo. It would have been much easier for everyone if the Triad boss just invited Seagal over for a game of mahjong. Throw in a pair of useless and annoying cops who follow Seagal everywhere and many pointless scenes, and you may start to get an idea of how bad this movie really is.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eThere are a few action sequences in the movie, but maybe only two that are of any real worth. Sadly, the best bit of this movie is a scene in which Seagal takes on a monkey-boxer who can defy gravity. Well, there goes Seagalu0026#39;s unique style of using Aikido in action movies. A few more movies like this, and Seagal flicks are going to be nothing more than 3rd rate clones of Hong Kong action movies, mark my word. Most of the fights are poorly choreographed and poorly edited, all based around trying to make Seagal look like an action hero while trying to hide the fact that he is still out of shape. It worked in u0026#39;Half Past Deadu0026#39;, but not here.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eOnto even more bad news: Here Seagal tries to act a lot, and his character is just boring. I never thought a boring action hero could exist, but here you are. He is more monotonous than usual, his character rarely says or does anything amusing (there is only one scene where his character does or says something cool) and just lacks personality. As for the bad guy, the movie returns to his office every few minute just so he can repeat what he has been saying for the whole movie, which is something like: u0026quot;The professor is giving us trouble, we must get rid of himu0026quot;. I actually felt tempted to barrack for the bad guy, had he not been so repetitive and annoying.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eSome final complaints: The special effects are pretty bad. Apart from the once-off terrible use of bullet-time, the fake backgrounds stand off as being laughable. Would filming in daylight have been that hard? As for Seagal speaking Chinese: it sounds worse than his use of Italian in u0026#39;Out for Justiceu0026#39;.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eu0026#39;Out for a Killu0026#39; is a terrible movie. Well deserving of its place in IMDbu0026#39;s worst 100 movies (it could probably take a higher spot…). I would not recommend it to fans of Seagal, but anyone willing to see something so bad it offends that it will offend good conscience should have a quick look – 1/10”