Ehemänner und Ehefrauen (1992)
14KEhemänner und Ehefrauen: Directed by Woody Allen. With Nick Metropolis, Woody Allen, Mia Farrow, Sydney Pollack. When their best friends announce that they’re separating, a professor and his wife discover the faults in their own marriage.
“A married couple, Sally (Judy Davis) and Jack (Sydney Pollack), tell their best friends–another married couple named Gabe (Woody Allen) and Judy (Mia Farrow)–that they are separating. This news throws Gabe and Judy into a tailspin. It makes them reexamine their own marriage and find it lacking. Meanwhile Sally starts seeing a handsome, romantic man (Liam Neeson) and Jack is living with a girl at least 30 years his junior. This film follows what happens to them over the course of a year.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eA fascinating film. Iu0026#39;m not married (or even straight) but I donu0026#39;t think that matters–this is about love, sex and relationships and has dialogue and situations that anyone can relate to. Allenu0026#39;s script is right on target–the insights are just incredible, and we slowly begin to see exactly how all of the four main characters really are. During the film they are all interviewed by a never seen person–these interviews really help the story and reveals how everybody feels about the others. It pulls everything together.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eThe acting is almost all great. Allen and Farrow were living together when this was filmed–when it was released they were in a bitter custody battle. This movie actually provides insight to WHY they broke up–their argument scenes are just a bit too realistic. Davis and Pollack are just superb in their roles. They let you feel their characters pain and confusion–just great acting. Neeseon isnu0026#39;t asked to do much but he is very affecting in his scenes. However Juliette Lewis is terrible as a college student. Her voice is nasal and whiny and her acting is pretty lousy–but it doesnu0026#39;t ruin the film.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eI saw this back in 1992 in a theatre and loved it. Twelve years later I STILL love it. A great film. Iu0026#39;m only giving this an 8 though. There are two big faults with this film: the hand-held jittery camera work being the main one. My guess is Allen filmed it this way to make the film more immediate and give it a documentary feel. It works but it IS distracting. Also it gets a little repetitious towards the end. Still this is well worth seeing. Recommended.”
