Der Untergang des Römischen Reiches (1964)

64K
Share
Copy the link

Der Untergang des Römischen Reiches: Directed by Anthony Mann. With Sophia Loren, Stephen Boyd, Alec Guinness, James Mason. The death of Marcus Aurelius leads to a succession crisis, in which the deceased emperor’s son, Commodus, demonstrates that he is unwilling to let anything undermine his claim to the Roman Empire.

“In his eminently readable autobiography, u0026quot;Blessings in Disguiseu0026quot; (Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1986), Sir Alec Guinness shares some reminiscences about his participation in this extravaganza (pp. 207-209). He thought the script was u0026quot;Not much,u0026quot; considered director Anthony Mann to be u0026quot;friendly…and well-disposed towards actors,u0026quot; and found u0026quot;a lot to like and admireu0026quot; in his co-star, Sophia Loren. He relates a story of their going to dinner on a wind-lashed rainy night in Madrid during production. As they proceeded to a waiting limousine, the dazzlingly gowned and coiffed Sophia suddenly tripped and fell full-length in a muddy puddle, u0026quot;…ruining her dress, bruising her hands and grazing her face.u0026quot; Upon repairing to her u0026quot;luxurious film-star apartment,u0026quot; despite Sir Alecu0026#39;s protestations, Sophia insisted upon keeping their engagement and reemerged ten minutes later, freshly and even more beautifully gowned and bearing nary a sign of her unfortunate spill.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eI wonu0026#39;t add much to the voluminous comments about the film itself, except to say that the Ultra Panavision 70 cinematography was best experienced in a first-run theater with top-notch projection and sound. I recall enjoying it, despite its longueurs, quite a bit more than the recent and tedious u0026quot;Gladiator.u0026quot; Itu0026#39;s interesting to note that Richard Harris, who appeared later in u0026quot;Gladiator,u0026quot; because of creative differences with the director, surrendered the role of Commodus in this film to Christopher Plummer, who seems to revel in the villainy of his part.”

Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *