Kanguva (2024)
25KKanguva (2024). 2h 32m
“Positives:n1. Stellar Performance: Suryau0026#39;s acting is truly exceptional. His nuanced expressions, especially his piercing gaze into the camera, are captivating.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003e2. Powerful Music: While not every DSP score hits the mark, the ones that do are absolute bangers.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003e3. Visual Brilliance: The cinematography, particularly in the flashback scenes and Suryau0026#39;s close-ups, is stunningly clear and concise.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003e4. Impressive Production Design: The film boasts breathtaking locations and impressive CGI, with minor flaws that are easily overlooked.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003e5. Memorable Moments: There are 4-5 scenes that showcase Suryau0026#39;s acting prowess and leave a lasting impact.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eNegatives:n1. Unoriginal Storyline: The plot, revolving around reincarnation, feels somewhat familiar and has been explored in numerous films.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003e2. Abrupt Editing: Some scenes abruptly cut to the next, interrupting the flow and leaving the audience wanting more.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003e3. Climax Disruption: The parallel cuts between Francis and Kanguva during the climax diminish the impact of the intense Kanguva war sequences.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003e4. Lack of Clarity: Certain scenes lack sufficient context, making it difficult to fully understand the narrative.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003e5. Unconvincing Villain: Bobby Deolu0026#39;s portrayal as the villain is over-the-top and comical, rather than menacing.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eOverall, the decision to split the film into two parts is questionable. While itu0026#39;s not necessarily bad, it disrupts the narrative flow, especially at a crucial point when the story is building to a climax.”
