City Hunter (2024)

City Hunter (2024). 1h 42m

“City Hunter is almost 30 years old. For a new audience, the production could have made a one on one adaptation of the manga and/or anime to get new fans. It wouldnu0026#39;t have hurt and the 90s kids (or earlier) would love it. City Hunter is not that hard to adapt IMO. This movie just becomes another action movie.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eBesides Kaori, which they changed a little the background, the main characters are from the source. The story is from the principal arc which is good but the introduction is too long to narrate. For a movie of 1h40 minutes, it should have focused on the characters with some small side missions for the 30 first minutes to know them better. Itu0026#39;s a miss from the prod. In the end, we donu0026#39;t know whatu0026#39;s xyz and donu0026#39;t even know what is City Hunter which is sad truly. City Hunter should be the light for the city of Tokyo. It should brings hope to the needy. But besides that we just get another action movie which is confusing and boring at time.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eCity Hunter (2024) has missed the mark to get introduced to new fans. It looks just like a fan service of something that is adaptable to a broader audience, but that tells nothing.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eThe ending sounds like itu0026#39;s open for new parts. If there are not other parts, then this movie is just a pass. It sometimes is too confusing unless the viewers know already the series.”