Benefit of the Doubt (1993)

Benefit of the Doubt (1993). 1h 30m | R

“Contemporary thrillers tend to get relatively poor reviews. These films are held to what I think is an unreasonably high standard. Admittedly, a genuinely good thriller is very hard to find these days. Itu0026#39;s about the writing mainly. The story counts a lot, as does the suitability of the actors to this genre. It seems that the glorification of multimillion dollar production values, meaning mainly special effects, has become more important to the industry than good writing and characterizations. For whatever reason, movies like The Taking of Pelham One Two Three (original), Charley Varick, and The Getaway (the original) are a thing of the past. (Then again, thereu0026#39;s the very good The Lincoln Lawyer.)u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eNowadays, all one can expect is the more or less artful use of derivative material. Standards, therefore, should change. Donu0026#39;t expect another Charley Varick. Benefit of the Doubt should satisfy those looking for a reasonably plausible story, well executed tension and of course a first rate villain. This movie delivers on all those fronts. Sure, characters sometimes behave unrealistically, but realism and plausibility are inessential to thrillers. Recall Hitchcocku0026#39;s accurate denigration of u0026quot;the plausiblesu0026quot;, i.e. those who undermine a thriller because of implausible elements. – Donald Sutherland gives us a masterfully characterized bad guy, yet another testimony to this fine actoru0026#39;s beautifully honed thespian chops. The movie did for me what an acceptable thriller should do: keep me interested and provide some genuine suspense. This film is nothing more and nothing less than a better than good enough popcorn movie.”