Gerhard Richter Painting (2011)

19K
Share
Copy the link

Gerhard Richter Painting (2011). 1h 37m | Unrated

“Gerhard Richter is an old man who doesnu0026#39;t like to be interviewed, who doesnu0026#39;t like to be filmed and who doesnu0026#39;t like to talk about his paintings. Heu0026#39;s also a very famous German artist and though he obviously couldnu0026#39;t care less about this film, some clever marketing executive said, hell, we do it anyway, cause he is so damn famous, once this film is out, the middle class intellectuals will flock into the cinema in order to feel sophisticated in the virtual presence of a true artist. Sadly enough, judging by the crowd it attracted when I went so see it, it worked pretty well. My main gripe with this film is that Corinna Belz, who I take to be some TV journalist, has no concept for this full length documentary. Apparently she was under the illusion that itu0026#39;s enough to just stumble into the studio of such a genius, turn on the camera and then the magic will unfold. Well, sadly enough, it doesnu0026#39;t. In fact nothing happens and Corinnau0026#39;s inane off camera questions (How long did it take you?) donu0026#39;t help either. But then she is not bold enough to concentrate on the one thing that does in fact happen, namely, Gerhard Richter in the process of painting; no, spoiled by television aesthetics the edit never lingers too long on the act itself but feels compelled to jet to New York and London for a more cosmopolitan flair. But whenever I was on the brink of nodding off I was jolted back to attention by archive footage from the sixties where an eloquent and rather angry Richter is talking about his approach towards art. That would have been the proper time to make a documentary like this. Back then when he was still able to express himself coherently, when he was on the peak of his artistic powers, when he wasnu0026#39;t the weary and rather tired superstar he is now. Another venerable approach would have been to actually tell us something about his art, his significance in todays art world, but no one here has the guts to do so. He created so many great paintings, but this film doesnu0026#39;t do him any justice. He apparently wants to be left alone in his studio so that he can concentrate on his art. Whatever happened to decorum in the film industry. Just because he is old, doesnu0026#39;t mean his wishes should be ignored, especially when the resulting film is as nondescript as this.”

Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *