The United States of Insanity (2021)16K
The United States of Insanity (2021). The United States of Insanity: Directed by Tom Putnam, Brenna Sanchez. With Howard Hertz, Shaggy 2 Dope, Violent J, Lorenzo Paul. The story of controversial rap duo Insane Clown Posse (ICP), their fans, and their ongoing struggle with the FBI in a landmark case that may be a bellwether of change for First Amendment rights in America.
“The film provides an in depth look into not only the Insane Clown Posse, but the loyal fan group, The Juggalos. It takes a deep dive into the life of the members, from childhood through the inception of their musical personas – Violent J, and Shaggy 2 Dope.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eNormally, Iu0026#39;d do a review or critique using the sandwich method (starting with what I liked, then going into what I think could have been better, then wrapping it up with more positives) but this film, I feel needs to start with the negatives, and after I explain them, itu0026#39;ll be more obvious why I chose to go this route.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eI will be direct in saying that this movie is an easy 8/10. Itu0026#39;s absolutely hilarious, and entertaining throughout, however the two major issues and things that keep it from being a 10/10 for me come from the inconsistency in story telling, and what feels like a lack of clear understanding (with the filmmakers) on what the documentary is about.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eThe film jumps around quite a bit, and at times the segments almost feel disconnected from one another. What I mean is that weu0026#39;ll be following ICP as they talk about where they grew up, and then itu0026#39;ll switch to the Juggalos talking about their experiences with law enforcement, then itu0026#39;ll talk about The Gathering of the Juggalos, and then more stories about Juggalos, and then more backstory on the musicians. The story is weaved together like a pair of shoelaces, which can be interesting, but it also takes away from the narrative at times.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eThe other thing that I feel hurts this film is that it seems like the filmmakers were unsure of what they wanted to focus on in the film. We often jump between ICP as the focal point, to the FBI labeling Juggalos as a gang as the focal point, to Juggalos and The Gathering as the focal point. Now, Iu0026#39;ve seen plenty of documentaries in my life, and understand that itu0026#39;s important to have individual stories and arcs within the main blanket story, however, this film feels like itu0026#39;s missing that main blanket, and instead wants all of these stories to be the main story. The film is marketed as ICP/Juggalos v The FBI, yet Iu0026#39;d say only 35 – 40 minutes of the almost 2 hour run time seems to focus on that, with the rest being mainly about ICP and the world they built. This isnu0026#39;t a massive issue, as without ICP there are no Juggalos, and vice versa.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eNow, with the two negatives out of the way, I can jump into what I loved about the film.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eThe filmmakers did something that seems to be difficult to do (at least from what Iu0026#39;ve seen in some recent documentaries) and that is to take both sides of the argument into consideration and present facts for both sides to the viewer. They present all information in an unbiased way, allowing people from all parties to express their thoughts, feelings, opinions, and data without criticism. It never blatantly tells the audience, u0026quot;These people are clearly wrongu0026quot; or u0026quot;These people are clearly rightu0026quot; but rather letu0026#39;s the audience decide for themselves.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eAnother thing I loved in the film is the perfectly placed humor. With documentaries, itu0026#39;s imperative to understand that the grey area is key, and extremes on either side can cause the audience to lose confidence in the story teller. This is especially true when dealing with subject matter that is serious – such as peopleu0026#39;s lives being ruined by law enforcement over what t-shirt they were wearing, or band they were listening to at the wrong place/time. This film understands how absurd the idea of being considered a criminal over listening to the music of two guys who paint themselves up like clowns and sing about killing pedophiles and domestic abusers is, and it shows that understanding through very subtle insertions of humor. A funny news headline here, old interview clip there, or perfectly placed punchline to a serious segment. For instance, there is a scene where a woman is discussing her husband – a longtime fan of ICP – and how heu0026#39;s serving life in prison. She smiles and explains that she brought his mugshot to a meet and greet to have signed by the band. The camera focuses on the photo long enough for the audience to process the absurdity of the scene, and soak in the hilarity of it all. A woman bringing her husbands mugshot to his favorite band to get signed. Not only is the strangeness of the request to have a mugshot signed comedic, but what the members of the group say to the woman, and her husband (who she calls during the signing) during it, is the icing on the comedic cake. These types of scenes are sprinkled perfectly throughout the film, and add the perfect level of humor to an otherwise serious documentary.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eThe last point Iu0026#39;d like to make is how deeply intriguing the film is, along with the message of, u0026quot;If it can happen to them, it can happen to you.u0026quot; This is not a film FOR Juggalos, but rather a film ABOUT Juggalos, and the acceptance and understanding that they lack from most of society. Itu0026#39;s insane to think that the government can deem someone as dangerous or a criminal based on who their favorite band is. And it makes you take a step back and really think about a question that pops up frequently in the film, u0026quot;If Juggalos can be considered a gang by the FBI for being fans of ICP, then what else can the FBI claim people are gang members for?u0026quot; We watch and learn about how a group of peopleu0026#39;s rights are imposed upon based on something as simple as musical preferences, and it leaves the audience pondering. Do a few bad apples spoil the bunch? Can we make a judgment based solely on the actions of a few outliers? What if it was you?u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eI loved every moment of this film, and was entertained throughout. It was engaging, informative, and intriguing from start to finish.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003e(A very strong) 8/10u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eBe sure to stay after the credits if youu0026#39;re a fan of ICP, as there is about 15 minutes of bonus live footage.”