Seed 2 (2014)

62K
Share
Copy the link

Seed 2: Directed by Kim Blanc, Marcel Walz. With Natalie Scheetz, Christa Campbell, Caroline Williams, Nick Principe. Coming back from her bachelor party in Las Vegas, Christine and her friends are driving through the hot desert of Nevada. But they are not alone – serial killer Max Seed is back and he brought the whole family.

“Letu0026#39;s get one thing straight: I only watched this film out of curiosity. I knew it was going to be bad, but I had seen the first movie by Uwe Boll a while ago and was curious to see how the sequel would turn out. Despite watching this movie with my expectations at almost zero, I still was appalled at how bad a flick this turned out to be. One of the worst movies Iu0026#39;ve EVER seen, and definitely the worst horror movie Iu0026#39;ve seen.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eThe first filmu0026#39;s director, Uwe Boll, is notorious for his poor films, which are said by numerous critics to suffer from serious flows in script, directing, acting, etc. This film, although directed by another director named Marcel Walz, does nothing but also fall into this category of Z-movies.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eLetu0026#39;s get down to what is actually wrong with the movie: a poorly written script filled with lazy and silly dialogue, effortless directing, wooden acting, infuriatingly amateur cinematography, cheesy and laughable special effects, and, perhaps worst of all, a story that makes little to no sense.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eThe film attempts a Pulp Fiction-like story structure in which the events of the film are not in chronological order, and therefore leaving it up to the viewer to figure which scene happened when. While this works in Pulp Fiction, it just makes this film confusing and wondering what the heck is going on.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eIn addition to these flaws, the film is not scary whatsoever, despite a few gross-out gore scenes that attempt to scare, but fail. The only remotely entertaining part of this film is the unintentional laughs that occur occasionally, but these goofs arenu0026#39;t enough to compensate for 90 minutes of boredom and eagerness for an ending.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eAnd letu0026#39;s not forget how little relevance this sequel has in relation to the first movie, showing almost no relation, and even lacking some of the very few decent qualities of the first one, too.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eDO NOT WATCH THIS FILM. A sheer waste of time.”

Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *