Charles – tot oder lebendig (1969)

63K
Share
Copy the link

Charles – tot oder lebendig: Directed by Alain Tanner. With François Simon, Marie-Claire Dufour, Marcel Robert, Maya Simon. On the 100th anniversary of the founding of a watchmaking company in Geneva, Charles Dé the founder’s 50-year-old grandson has had it: he speaks eccentrically to a reporter, recognizing his grandfather as a craftsman and his son as a businessman, but is evasive about himself. He gives his family the slip and moves in with a young couple he meets by chance, doing the cooking, reading, drinking, and engaging in philosophical discussions with them. The young couple comes to love Charles. In secret, he stays in touch with a daughter, and the rest of the family hires a private investigator to find him, setting in motion a business take-over that threatens his Bohemian happiness.

“A small-scale industrialist decides heu0026#39;s had enough, for no clearly elucidated reason, and does a runner. He discards his glasses, adopts a false name and lands first in a seedy hotel where he lies morosely in bed all day. Up to this point–apart from a dull television interview (did the French really take that kind of thing seriously?)–the film was intriguing enough, but once Mr Dé hooks up with a funky Bohmenian couple there is little further development. And thanks to the overbearing character played by Marcel Robert–some kind of gentle giant–the film becomes an irksome labour to watch, like a morose u0026#39;Jules et Jimu0026#39;. The film would have been better off without the Bohemians altogether, and, we cannot but help suppose, so would Mr Dé.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eThe action is mainly static and bereft of interesting images or cinematic movement. People sit around or stand around lamenting about nothing in particular in mournful tones and spouting philosophical epigrams with a degree of pretentiousness that only the French donu0026#39;t realise is pretentious. The film is almost entirely composed of these conversations. Some scenes only serve to disengage, with odd behaviour (running up a gravel mound), blatant symbolism (pushing a car off a cliff), much awkward, self-conscious acting as if the actors were embarrassed to be bogged down in all the forced meaning, and terrible directing, such as when Mr Dé is sitting at a table in a cafe absurdly squeezed up to two other people who donu0026#39;t even look at him when he starts an unpleasant drunken tirade.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eThis is the fag end of the leftist utopia that went up in flames the previous year. Yes, we get the loss of identity and sense of despair, but was there no other treatment than this? In u0026#39;The Bedsitting Roomu0026#39;, Spike Milligan also dealt with the last flickering of the human spirit in a wrecked world, but that was a work of surreal genius. This humourless and tendentious allegory of lost hope is hard going and only fans of wintry atmosphere will find it worthwhile.”

Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *