Schlag 12 in London (1960)

Schlag 12 in London: Directed by Terence Fisher. With Paul Massie, Dawn Addams, Christopher Lee, David Kossoff. Dr. Henry Jekyll experiments with scientific means of revealing the hidden, dark side of man and releases a murderer from within himself.

“Dr. Henry Jekyll (Paul Massie) is working on a serum that brings out the animal instincts of man. After testing it on a monkey (who goes berserk), he turns to himself. As his alternate self, Edward Hyde, he stumbles upon his friendu0026#39;s treachery and his wifeu0026#39;s sordid affair. Hyde, the animal that he is, is ready to go on his own little excursion into debauchery and hedonism.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eI was really blown away by this film. The Jekyll/Hyde story has been told again and again and the main character has been portrayed by countless actors. Yet, this may be the great version out there — definitely the best one Iu0026#39;ve seen yet. The Canadian actor playing both roles was a new face for me, but is pretty amazing and I couldnu0026#39;t see the two personas as the same actor no matter how hard I tried. It was quite impressive.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eChristopher Lee, ever-present in the Hammer films (did he ever have a day off?), plays friend Paul Allen. Wow. Iu0026#39;ve praised Lee in u0026quot;Scream of Fearu0026quot;, but he should be praised no less in this, where heu0026#39;s a convincingly sleazy gambler and womanizer. Not the way I picture Lee to be, but it seems so natural here. The more I see this man in action, the more I see what the generation before me saw. I had always been a Peter Cushing fan, but maybe itu0026#39;s time for me to switch sides? I enjoyed the philosophical questions raised by this film. Thereu0026#39;s the portrayal of Hyde as younger, more handsome and more charming… not the monster heu0026#39;s usually shown to be. I think this fit well… he still had the spontaneous violence, but not unlike the devil himself, knew his way to get to people with savoir faire. Early on, Jekyll also talks of the man u0026quot;beyond good and evilu0026quot;, the u0026quot;higher manu0026quot;, evoking the words of philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, though certainly not in the way Nietzsche would have endorsed. Both Nietzscheu0026#39;s and Jekyllu0026#39;s higher man use their wills to gain what they most desire, but Hyde is something of an unhinged creature, not the refined and academic man Nietzsche preferred.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eNietzsche also spoke of u0026quot;beyond good and evilu0026quot; as a transcendence of morality, moving beyond our traditional concepts and accepting that there is good and bad, but no overarching divine good or evil. In this regard, Hyde may be comparable. He certainly has no care for his u0026quot;evilu0026quot; actions… though one suspects that not even Nietzsche would support these u0026quot;badu0026quot; actions destroying those around him.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eYou must pick up this film (preferably in the four-disc set of Hammer films also containing u0026quot;The Gordonu0026quot; and u0026quot;Scream of Fearu0026quot;). You donu0026#39;t need to be as analytical or philosophical as I am when digesting it, but youu0026#39;ll love the film for its great characters and hedonistic wickedness… drunken, licentious men in 1870s London? Let the depravity begin.”