Der Glöckner von Notre Dame (TV Movie 1982)

30K
Share
Copy the link

Der Glöckner von Notre Dame: Directed by Michael Tuchner, Alan Hume. With Anthony Hopkins, Derek Jacobi, David Suchet, Gerry Sundquist. Disfigured man Quasimodo (Sir Anthony Hopkins) is feared and tormented by the townspeople of Notre Dame, but he has a sensitive nature of which few are aware.

“With every different version of u0026quot;The Hunchback of Notre Dameu0026quot; that I have ever seen, I hope again that I will one day see a film that copies the novel exactly. Victor Hugou0026#39;s novel is a tragedy all the way, and it does NOT have a happy ending, or even a semi-happy one! The only version that is most like u0026quot;Notre Dame de Parisu0026quot; is the 1977 film described elsewhere in this site. However, the 1982 version comes closer than the earlier ones, which, because of censorship, could not have an Archbishop feverishly pursuing a heathen gypsy female through the dark streets of Paris, laying aside his priestly vows to lust after her to the death. This dark, Gothic romance cries out for black and white–it just doesnu0026#39;t work in color, and the color here is gorgeous. See the 1939 Laughton version to see what I mean. And speaking of the Laughton version, Anthony Hopkins is obviously copying Charles Laughtonu0026#39;s legendary performance, and does it quite well–one great actoru0026#39;s nod to another. Has Anthony Hopkins ever given a bad performance? Or has Derek Jacobi, for that matter? He succeeds in making Dom Claude what I have always considered this character to be–not a villain, but a pathetic, pitiable character torn between his holy vows and his forbidden lust for a beautiful gypsy dancer. Lesley-Ann Down is lovely, to say the least, as Esmeralda, and the supporting cast is solid. David Suchet as Clopin is fine in his own way, but it was a thankless task to try to follow Thomas Mitchellu0026#39;s great, over-the-top turn as the King of the Beggars in the 1939 version. Though this version is not as good as it could have been, it still is one of the best, and well worth your time.”

Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *