Kennwort 777 (1948)

5K
Share
Copy the link

Kennwort 777: Directed by Henry Hathaway. With James Stewart, Richard Conte, Lee J. Cobb, Helen Walker. Chicago reporter P.J. McNeal re-opens a decade-old murder case.

“—–It came as a surprise when Guy Ritchie was chosen as the Director of u0026#39;Sherlock Holmes.u0026#39; Known primarily for his work on indie crime films, such as u0026#39;Snatchu0026#39; or last yearu0026#39;s u0026#39;RocknRolla,u0026#39; Ritchie had never taken on a mainstream franchise film, the likes of which u0026#39;Sherlock Holmesu0026#39; promised to be. Thankfully, Ritchie was able to mesh the two genres on some level, with his trademark style of film-making ever present in his latest outing. The result is a film that will surely prove the most popular take on the character outside of Conan Doyleu0026#39;s original novels, and will also likely spawn a franchise.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003e—–Sherlock Holmes and his partner Dr. Watson have been successfully solving cases throughout England for years. Their most recent case was that of Lord Blackwood, a man who murdered in the name of his black magic. Finally hanged for his crimes, it comes as an unpleasant surprise when he literally rises from his grave. And so it is up to Holmes and Watson to find him and stop him before his killing spree devours the whole of England.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003e—–Robert Downey Jr. is right at home in the role of the infamous detective. Swapping out futuristic armor for a pipe and fiddle, he plays another character with the wit and confidence of his Tony Stark persona in u0026#39;Iron Man.u0026#39; This makes sense because, to some degree, what is u0026#39;Sherlock Holmesu0026#39; if not merely the Tony Stark character set back about a hundred years? Regardless, Downey Jr. is excellent, providing an effervescent wit and supreme charm to his latest role. Jude Law plays his right hand man, Dr. John Watson, in a role much smarter than past incarnations of the Watson character. The two are more equals than hero and sidekick, and their chemistry is indelible. Even when the narrative becomes a bit erratic, the pleasure of seeing the two starsu0026#39; continuous verbal quarrels is worth the price of admission alone. Together they inspire numerous laughs and clever rebuttals to an unrelenting degree, allowing many of the jokes to pass unrealized, saved for the treat of a second viewing.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003e—–u0026#39;Sherlock Holmesu0026#39; has a method completely reminiscent of Director Guy Ritchieu0026#39;s earlier films. In the style of show first-explain later, Ritchie has effectively applied his trademark fast cuts to the mind of his lead protagonist. Much as Watson is often catching up to Holmesu0026#39; various schemes, so must the audience sit in question for a large portion of the film, waiting for Holmes to reveal his motivations. Particularly similar to his work on last yearu0026#39;s entertaining u0026#39;RocknRolla,u0026#39; along with many of his other films, Ritchie takes the first hour of his endeavors laying out the dots to be connected in his lengthy but fast-paced crescendo throughout the second half of the film. With u0026#39;Holmes,u0026#39; he has compromised nothing, rather managed to find a better balance between build up and climax. With various fistfight intervals dissecting the chaotic mystery, Ritchie keeps the audience entertained even when theyu0026#39;re unsure about the direction of the plot. That being said, many viewers will begin to question their purchase throughout the films first half hour, as the story puzzles more than entertains. But rest assured, a satisfying finale follows, with so many pieces coming together that a second viewing is a necessity to begin dissecting the intricacies of the case being solved, if that only means better understanding Holmesu0026#39; course of action.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003e—–Visually Ritchie has constructed a film in the shadows, only occasionally getting out into spanning shots of daylight England. This, like the rest of the film, settles into place as the film develops. His infamous lightning cuts allow no slow moments, even when the pace would typically meander in the hands of a lesser Director. Holmes also riddles off explanations so rapidly that audiences can hardly pick up on all of what he is saying, or all of the nuanced humor during the interplay between Watson and him. Unfortunately much of the laugh-out-loud humor as been divulged in the trailer, but a film should not be penalized for the faults of its advertising campaign. The musical score is supplemental to the frantic convolutions of the filmu0026#39;s earlier scenes, providing a spirited tune that rides the energy of fiddling and poses as anything but generic. The locations are likewise smart, the costumes are admirable, and the effects are gritty, proving to be another benefit of having an indie Director helm an event film. Ultimately there are no blatant shortcuts in the way of computer generation, only clever sets and a brilliant Art Direction.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003e—–u0026#39;Sherlock Holmesu0026#39; is refreshingly less conventional than one might guess, even if some viewers may find themselves a bit lost by Ritchieu0026#39;s unforgiving cuts and unrelenting energy. It jumps right into the tale, no origins told and no flashbacks necessary, relying on Holmes renowned history. Furthermore, many subtle elements of the various charactersu0026#39; past interactions are left for the audience to deduce in the fashion of Sherlock Holmes himself. And while the film may not be the grand epic some may have hoped for, its sheer entertainment value is undeniable. From the moment the credits roll itu0026#39;s apparent that u0026#39;Sherlock Holmesu0026#39; cannot be full appreciated in one screening, and will likely grow in favor upon further viewings. It further presents itself as a gem of home entertainment in the long run, as a film that can be enjoyed on any occasion in any company, even with its hefty two-hour-plus runtime. This is a byproduct of the wonderfully gritty action Ritchie brings to the tale, and the uncompromising portrayal of the classic characters by the films superb leads. u0026#39;Sherlock Holmesu0026#39; wonu0026#39;t be quite what you expect, and you may even be dismayed by the films feisty narrative style, but more often than not youu0026#39;ll be completely entertained by the characters on screen in this fun addition to the loaded Holiday season.”

Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *