Gods and Generals (2003)

Gods and Generals: Directed by Ron Maxwell. With Donzaleigh Abernathy, Mark Aldrich, George Allen, Keith Allison. The rise and fall of confederate general Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson, as he meets with military success against the Union from 1861 to 1863, when he is accidentally killed by his own soldiers.

“This movie was originally slated to come in at a monumental 6 hours, but in advance screenings, it was found that audiences couldnu0026#39;t sit for that long, and so Ronald Maxwell took the hatchet to the film and sliced off over two hours to bring it in at under 4 hours. Unfortunately, it would seem that the material that he excised was vital to the telling of the story, as what seems to have been taken off was vital character exposition at the beginning of the story. So unless youu0026#39;ve read the book, you might have no idea as to some of the central characteru0026#39;s motivations for their actions.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eMost telling is the lack of explanation of why Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain, a professor of rhetoric and revealed religion at Bowdoin College in Maine, left the sanctity of the classroom to take up soldiering. One minute, we see him in the classroom giving lessons, the next is a scene where his wife tells him that she knows heu0026#39;s going off to war and wonders why. We have no explanation as to why this happened, and so the audience is left to wonder why this ordinary citizen would end up becoming a Lieutenant Colonel in the 20th Maine Regiment of Volunteers.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eMaxwell seems to have decided to focus the majority of the movieu0026#39;s story on Thomas J. u0026quot;Stonewallu0026quot; Jackson, paying mere lip service to the story of the Union men most prominently featured in the book, Winfield Scott Hancock and Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain. While the Confederates certainly paint a more colourful picture, man to man, than the seemingly more wooden characters on the Union side, it detracts from what could have made the movie far and away more dramatic, as u0026quot;Gettysburgu0026quot; managed to achieve a balance between telling the story going back and forth across the field, between the Confederate and Union sides, to tell the story.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eOne has to wonder if Maxwell didnu0026#39;t begin to realise that maybe he had gotten in over his head with the telling of this story and with so many characters central to the telling of it. There are some powerful and dramatic scenes in the book that are simply never told in the movie, or are paid lip service to, like the scene where Chamberlain is lying on the ground trying to sleep during the Battle of Fredericksburg. In the book, he hears a window shutter flapping in the night breeze, its eerie rhythm seeming to chant, u0026quot;Never, forever, never, forever.u0026quot; That was never in the movie, although I got the feeling that this scene was one that may well have ended up on the cutting room floor. We see Chamberlain lying on the battlefield in the winter cold, trying to use the dead bodies around him for warmth to sleep, but again, this scene is painfully too short to reveal its true dramatic impact.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eSadly, one of the most pivotal battles of the early Civil War, Antietam, was removed from the film for reasons of length. I cannot imagine why this battle had to go, as it was one of the reasons that Lincoln issued his Emancipation Proclamation. It also detracts from the telling of the film, as one minute we are at Bull Run and the next weu0026#39;re at Fredericksburg, with Burnside in command of the armies. McClellan isnu0026#39;t even featured in the movie, as his scenes obviously ended up on the cutting room floor. This, again, is evidence of how Maxwell seemed to feel as if he got in over his head and had to take out vital scenes and characters to trim his film down for theatrical release. Itu0026#39;s only a shame he didnu0026#39;t choose to excise some of the more windy speeches that did nothing to move the story along.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003enWord has it that a fully restored version of this film is due out at Christmas on DVD format. Although I donu0026#39;t personally own a DVD player at this time, I may well invest in one, just to be able to see this film in its fully restored format. Itu0026#39;s just a shame that the film that the majority of the public will go to see may well leave those who donu0026#39;t know their Civil War history as well as some of us a bit confused. It doesnu0026#39;t pay to see this film without having first read the book. Otherwise, this film would be an overly bloated and confusing film that fails to reveal much about its central characters motivations. Sadly, I cannot give it two full thumbs up, but the battle scenes are worth the price of admission alone. Itu0026#39;s just a shame that character development was left on the cutting room floor in favour of showing more scenes of the battles. This film suffers because of that flaw.”