For All Mankind (1989)

For All Mankind: Directed by Al Reinert. With Jim Lovell, Russell Schweickart, Eugene Cernan, Michael Collins. An in-depth look at various NASA moon landing missions, starting with Apollo 8.

“This was effective for this viewer. Usually what that means in cases like this is that it made me cry. u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eThe hook is that it reviews its subject through the eyes of the astronauts. I was wary of this. I got involved in the program later, during the beginning of the shuttle era and even then the astronauts were pretty much there only to have been taken there. They were chosen — some of them — for how good they looked on newsprint. u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eThe magic of the program and its heroes were a few visionaries and an army of competent engineers. u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eYet it was effective because we see the story through the eyes of witnesses. There role here is simply as witness, and if you were alive during this time, you will be impressed at how it affects you.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eThere were all sorts of paths that could have been followed in this. The quest of man to explore; the mysteries of the unknown; the vast game being played by two enemies to demonstrate superiority of ideology; the hidden weapons programs.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eThey cover all these slightly except that last, and thatu0026#39;s excusable because these witnesses saw none of that. But the story that dominates is the Kennedy one. Its hard to imagine today, but we loved our president and he deserved it. He was intelligent and articulate. His advisers came off not as louts or bullies, but men (and a few women) smart enough for difficult times. He was the Peace Corps president. u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eKennedy promised to go to the moon and return without consulting anyone at NASA, and riding on the crest of a national enthusiasm for science and hardware. The nation really was engaged. And then he was killed, and with our rising self-doubt (Vietnam, race) we decided that as a people we owed it to him, or what he stood for. So when it happened, and the world watched, re affirmed the man and what he stood for. It was a good feeling, not pride as much as wonder about who we discovered ourselves to be.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eThis will evoke that same feeling again, the original tears, followed by tears of disappointment at the massive collapse of esteem which followed. A serious of botched opportunities to be worthy of the accomplishment.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eIts an effective documentary in that regard, all the more so since everything was designed to be photographed, and was. If you really want to learn of this program, you need to go elsewhere, But this delivers on the promise.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eTedu0026#39;s Evaluation — 3 of 3: Worth watching.”