Nymphomaniac: Vol. I (2013)

Nymphomaniac: Vol. I (2013)

Released: 2013
Genre: Drama, Genre, movie18
Director: Lars von Trier
Starring: Stacy Martin, Stellan Skarsgård, Charlotte Gainsbourg, ,
Run time: 117 min
IMDb: 6.9/10
Country: Denmark
Views: 38460

Synopsis

Storyline:
A man named Seligman finds a fainted wounded woman in an alley and he brings her home. She tells him that her name is Joe and that she is nymphomaniac. Joe tells her life and sexual experiences with hundreds of men since she was a young teenager while Seligman tells about his hobbies, such as fly fishing, reading about Fibonacci numbers or listening to organ music.
Written by
Claudio Carvalho, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
User Reviews: This is the best movie I’ve seen from Lars Von Trier. Brilliantly constructed, well directed, with lot of imagination and using many techniques (although I’m not a specialist). I include in my review the volume II as well. After watching the first one, yesterday, didn’t have patience for see the second part. The idea of a Sheherezada tail, nowadays, makes the background. I loved the way the chapters telling Joe’s life are separated by the intermezzos: her dialogs with Seligman, his erudition, her intelligence shadowed only by the all pervasive guilt feeling… I found the explicit key of the movie in the second part… in one of their dialogs. I try to remember it, it might not be 100% accurate: “Do you know what is characterizing our age? – Hypocrisy! People who tell beautiful lies are acclaimed and accepted, they form the majority; the few ones who tell the truth, often uncomfortable, are rejected!” Von Trier plays with two opposite characters: a nymphomaniac (probably more a being desperate to understand life meaning and get out of the beaten track than anything else), who never finds happiness in her search, so she goes further and further, and a 60 years old virgin who lives alone and finds his happiness in books. He plays as well with religion, with the concepts of purity and sin, with plenty of symbols amassed cleverly together. He shows us, in fact, our obsession with sex, with human bodies, with chair, making fun of the ones who will refuse his movie, scandalized. In our world which sells mainly with the help of sex, rejecting this movie is a huge hypocrisy. The only disappointment for me was the end of the second part… I don’t see why he chose it, but probably will find later on the answer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

1 Comment