Schoolgirls in Chains (1973)

Schoolgirls in Chains: Directed by Don Jones. With Gary Kent, John Parker, Stafford Morgan, Suzanne Lund. Two deranged brothers, who are under the domineering influence of their crazed mother, kidnap young girls and keep them captive in chains in their basement, where they subject them to depraved “games” that often end in torture and murder.

“This bizarre slice of u0026quot;Drive-Inu0026quot; cinema takes obvious influence from films such as Psycho, and handles the graphic and unsettling themes of incest, rape, torture and necrophilia. The film wallows in its sadistic nature, and itu0026#39;s rather unsurprising that Schoolgirls in Chains has suffered banning in several countries, including the UK (although itu0026#39;s not an official Video Nasty). It has to be said, however, that it really isnu0026#39;t all that good; as while the themes comes across in a way that is as sick and as sleazy as possible; the whole piece is actually rather boring on the whole. If you go into this film expecting something along the lines of The Texas Chain Saw Massacre or The Last House on the Left, you will no doubt come out disappointed; as Donald M. Jonesu0026#39; film is as good as neither notorious film. The plot follows the antics of two deranged brothers who take delight in holding schoolgirls captive by chaining them up in their basement. However, theyu0026#39;re not content with merely holding the girls; as the brothersu0026#39; sick and sadistic nature means that they have to subject the girls to a number of humiliating games.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eAs you would expect from a film with a title like u0026quot;Schoolgirls in Chainsu0026quot;, the atmosphere is very sleazy; and shots that see the young, innocent girls wearing a collar pretty much sum the film up. Director Donald M. Jones (probably a pseudonym) stays away from making the film overly erotic, however, and itu0026#39;s probably a good thing that Schoolgirls in Chains doesnu0026#39;t depict the actions of its lead characters in a favourable light. Jonesu0026#39; direction is solid, but since this film was made for the drive-in, you canu0026#39;t expect any directorial brilliance – and this film doesnu0026#39;t have any. The acting is similar in that itu0026#39;s nothing to write home about, although both Gary Kent and John Stoglin get to have fun in their absurd roles. Stoglin plays the retarded side of the pair of brothers, but itu0026#39;s Gary Kent who wins most of the plaudits where the acting is concerned for his portrayal of the more subdued side of the pair. The locations are well used, and the house in which most of the film takes place is suitably rural and isolated. Overall, this film isnu0026#39;t bad and will no doubt appeal to exploitation fans; but itu0026#39;s not as great as similar seventies genre efforts such as The Last House on the Left and House on Straw Hill.”