Die unheimliche Begegnung der 3. Art (1977)
30KDie unheimliche Begegnung der 3. Art: Directed by Steven Spielberg. With Richard Dreyfuss, François Truffaut, Teri Garr, Melinda Dillon. Roy Neary, an electric lineman, watches how his quiet and ordinary daily life turns upside down after a close encounter with a UFO.
“When I saw this first in the theatre I was blown away. It affected me profoundly. I thought the whole concept was fresh and new, the family strife, the yearning for and then actively seeking a higher concept for oneu0026#39;s life, the mental breakdown of the main character as he tries to visualize whatu0026#39;s inside his head: messages from alien beings.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eRichard Dreyfus, Francois Truffaut, Teri Garr, Melinda Dillon, all perfectly cast. Along with Cary, the child actor who is brilliant.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eAs a microcosm of life in the seventies, the film is amazingly evocative, the perfect young family suburb, the children, the stay at home wife, the backyard barbecues. The husband who is a dreamer and when he starts to act it out, shatters this perfect home life.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eThen the action moves to the mountain where the aliens are preparing to land. This scene got me in the theatre and gets me now. It is highly emotional. The music, the lights, the response of the mother ship. Highly charged cinematic moments.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eHowever, and it is a big one. The transition of Richard Dreyfussu0026#39;s character is far too sudden, he turns his back on children he obviously adores without any reflection whatsoever. How on earth would they survive in a seventies world without his income? Also Bob Balaban and Richard Dreyfuss are almost twin like in appearance and I kept getting them mixed up.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eFrancois Truffaut gave a fine performance as did many of the minor players. And the special affects – way before modern CGI – are breathtaking for their time.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eSometimes one is better leaving a movie seen in a theatre on its release exactly there: a one time viewing only. Seeing it for a second time removes the wonder and awe of that first viewing.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eI would have given it a 9 the first time, this time a 6 so I calculated a 7 out of 10 to be fair.”
