Putney Swope (1969)

Putney Swope: Directed by Robert Downey Sr.. With Stan Gottlieb, Allen Garfield, Archie Russell, Ramon Gordon. The board of directors at a Madison Avenue ad agency must elect a new chairman. In the maneuvering to make sure that enemies don’t get votes, all the members accidentally cast their ballot for the board’s token black man, Putney Swope.

“u0026quot;Putney Swopeu0026quot; is a unique, low low low budget gem from the late 1960u0026#39;s which probably would have been forgotten in time if it hadnu0026#39;t been for two things: Paul Thomas Anderson (who named Don Cheadleu0026#39;s character in u0026quot;Boogie Nightsu0026quot;, Buck Swope, after the eponymous hero of this film) and the limited DVD release. Watching u0026quot;Putney Swopeu0026quot; is like listening to hardcore punk rock: it may not make a lot of sense (at least to me it didnu0026#39;t upon watching it for the first time), but you have to respect the film for its passion and unabashedly rebellious message. I didnu0026#39;t understand a lot of things about u0026quot;Putney Swopeu0026quot;, but for the most part, I liked it. The more I think about the movie, the more it grows on me.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eThe film is advertised as a parody of New Yorku0026#39;s Madison Avenue, best known in the 1960u0026#39;s as the advertising capital of the world. Members of Generation X and Y may be lost on this concept, but fortunately u0026quot;Mad Menu0026quot; is on TV to provide us with this otherwise lost piece of U.S. History. What you need to know before watching this movie is that these ad agencies were largely male, and even more largely white establishments.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eWith this premise in mind, the movie opens up with an ad agency board meeting. The members are predominantly white except for Putney Swope (Arnold Johnson, who bears an uncanny resemblance to Dick Gregory in this film), the token African-American on the board. The board members are so self-absorbed and soulless that when their chairman falls dead in front of them, their only concern is who will become chairman next. Without even removing the body from the boardroom, they begin a paper ballot to elect the next chairman.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003ePutney Swope is elected by a landslide, but not because the other members think Swope is qualified. Voting for Swope was an ill-fated attempt for these board members to sabotage any other memberu0026#39;s chance of being elected chairman. With their plans backfired, Swope takes charge and u0026quot;sink(s) the boatu0026quot;, firing all but one of the original members and hiring all people of color in their place .u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eAfter this point, the film became (for me) very weird and hard to follow plot-wise. There may not have even been a plot, really. The whole idea of the film seems to be a u0026quot;what ifu0026quot; scenario, with the result being that the new u0026quot;Truth and Soul Inc.u0026quot; firm would be unconventional, but successful nonetheless. The firm ends up making so much money that the members build a huge glass case to keep the cash in for unexplained purposes. It could be because Swope doesnu0026#39;t trust banks, although that point is not touched upon or explained in the film. It could also be metaphoric in some way, but who knows.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eMost of the movie takes place inside the ad agency, with occasional scenes in the White House with a president who, for some unknown reason, is a midget. My assumption is here that some political joke was being made, but I canu0026#39;t figure out what. Were the filmmakers saying that the president is a small, insignificant part of American life? Were they saying that the latest elected officials (Nixon at the time) were insignificant candidates? I donu0026#39;t know. I found it a bit eerie, however, that the man playing the president bore a striking resemblance to future president Ronald Reagan. It is funny to make that connection 40 years after the movie was made.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eWhat this film may have benefited from is showing how consumers outside the ad agency reacted to the new ads. Of course, the ad footage possessed a strange, funny appeal for its unconventional creativity, but did these ads convince people to buy the product? If so, how? The movie hinted on the idea that the new ad campaign was successful through client interaction and the calls from the White House. However, it would have been revealing to see average people, since that demographic has always been most profitable for advertisers.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eAlthough the parodies and political messages this film may have made probably didnu0026#39;t stand the test of time, this film still had a lot of unique qualities. Arnold Johnson had a magnetic X factor to him that benefited him greatly in this film. Swopeu0026#39;s rough voice was actually director Robert Downey, Sr.u0026#39;s voice dubbed in, sometimes poorly, but fit the character so well in being an authoritative outsider. He hires and fires workers at random, but earns the respect of all but one of the employees for revolutionizing the ad agency and seeking out new ideas.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eThe premise of the film was, and still is, incredibly risky, especially since the film was written and directed by a white man (Robert Downey, Sr.). However, this film declines to fall victim to negative black stereotypes which would lead to the rise and fall of the blaxploitation genre years later. Although some of the sex scenes may be a bit off-putting for some viewers, the main message is that a black owned and operated business can thrive through innovation and risk taking. Many people may not take a positive message away from this movie, but I just did.u003cbr/u003eu003cbr/u003eu0026quot;Putney Swopeu0026quot; remains an overlooked movie from a strange era, and Downey, Sr. (even despite his sonu0026#39;s recent comeback) never quite got the recognition as a director he deserved. However, if you find a DVD of this movie, buy it and watch it. If itu0026#39;s on Netflix, ditto. Itu0026#39;s a movie that can be confusing at times, but is worth watching for its gusto, ambition, and its non-conformist stature even by todayu0026#39;s movie standards.”